Well the vote is in and now closed. Sifu is out and removed from his position as treasurer of TIME. Open to read analysis.

So, now that is concluded, another proposal is being voted on and closes 31st January.

In progress, but so far a clear "Yes" to the proposal. What does it mean to the shareholders and investors in this project for the future?

So, from the above, for the investor and the choice by this proposal, it's a choice between "a rock and a hard place". So, does this now mean if this "Yes" vote holds then that's the end of it? If so, I believe the majority of investors will leave at a loss with many a big one at that. IMO, Sestagalli mismanaged the project by ignoring Sifu's past (which he indeed did know of from the outset of treasury position  and not a 'month' ago ...click links to yesterdays post on Banter Crypto-Analysts for a breakdown of this)  and thus TIME has come to this crisis point by Sestagalli's hand alone.

As I was searching for updates today, I came across another article if you wish to read. Sifu took out 4,250 TIME tokens without consent.

Screenshot a snippet from full story on Altcoin buzz. Ok, now this is a moot point as Sifu now removed, but did that not raise a red flag for Sestagalli? Again doesn't put him in a good light.

**All screenshots above bar last one are from links within this Twitter post by Wonderland.

Please click on this link for my previous story about Sestagalli knowing all along and within that post is a link to MMA-Crypto's original personal story also. If you don't know this story at all, please click through the previous stories in post below.

Shame for the investor that put faith into this project: It could have worked but indeed the nail in the coffin was placed there by DS's mismanagement. Can this project be salvaged? Whatever the final outcome I hope those investors can move on. What do you think of this scandal? If you have any opinions or wish to add anything, don't by shy,please comment below.

Cheers, CryptoGlyn.